We've detected you are coming from a location inside the Americas.

Please choose one of the following:

Close
Global sites: BSRIA Inc BSRIA SARL BSRIA Business Consulting (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Phone+44 (0) 1344 465600 Contact BSRIA

Life cycle assessment - an introductionJuly 2014

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a structured method for calculating the environmental, human health and natural resources depletion impacts of goods and services. It can be applied to any product or process, but in construction and building services it can include manufactured products, processes, assemblies, entire HVAC systems or even whole buildings. This might sound simple, but it is in fact a complex topic. The purpose of this article is to introduce the basics of LCA, while also giving a glimpse of the scale of that complexity.


Figure 1: Impact categories within LCA (click image to zoom)
The assessment can represent many different lifecycle stages of the goods or services. The two main ones are cradle to grave”, where goods are modelled from raw material extraction through manufacture, delivery, use and disposal, and “cradle to gate”, where goods are modelled from raw material extraction through to manufacture and packaging ready to be shipped to a wholesaler, retailer or end-customer. A third lifecycle is gate to gate  which is used for modelling processes just within a single manufacturing organisation, say taking a set of off-the-shelf products and assembling them into a new product.

The impacts covered in LCA are very broad. They go far beyond carbon dioxide emissions or other greenhouse gases. For example, the standard impact categories include non-renewable resource use, acidification and ecotoxicity - see Figure1. Greenhouse gases are more correctly covered under global warming potential, where the global warming effects of different gases are appropriately factored and combined into a single figure expressed as Carbon Dioxide equivalent (CO2e).

The range of goods and services that contribute to the manufacture or use of a single product can be unexpectedly complicated, even circular.

The complexity of life cycle inventories, where the list of constituents for a given product are stored, can be demonstrated by the case of the mineral wool that might be used as an insulation material for ductwork and pipework. The inventory for this product contains many different inputs of products, recycled materials and natural resources including basalt, limestone, coke, electricity, water, rail transport, and many different outputs
of wastes including waste heat, particulates, and municipal solid waste, and different emissions to air, water and soil including carbon dioxide. All of these inputs themselves have inventories and their inputs will also have inventories, and so on. The ultimate aim is to compile the full list of outputs and emissions in sufficient detail for the analysis.

In fact, loops can often be found within the life cycle inventory analysis, where the impacts of all resource, material and process flows that cross the system boundary are analysed. For example, a product that has steel as a raw material means that coal is included as this is one of the inputs for manufacturing steel. But coal is mined and processed using equipment that includes steel.

The reliance on inventory data and the complexity of its analysis means that software is usually needed to carry out LCA. BSRIA was involved in the European CILECCTA project which developed a software package that takes account of both LCA and life cycle costing (LCC). This helps decisions to be made based on both environmental and economic performance of  alternative construction materials, products, or building designs over their respective lifetimes.

The description of the mineral wool inventory, above, raises another important issue – that of the functional unit. As well as its ability to identify environmental hot-spots, LCA is also a comparison tool where one technical design can be compared with one or more alternatives to find out which is the best. To make the comparison fair, each solution has to be analysed on the basis of its performance. For example, two different insulation materials for pipework would be analysed on the basis of the U-value they provide. This would then need to be analysed to understand how much of the insulation would be needed in each case – for example, insulation for a 10m length of 50mm pipe might require x kg of mineral wool and y kg of expanded foam. The inventories stored in the database would both be compiled on the basis of 1kg of the insulation material and the various inputs and outputs would be scaled accordingly.


Figure 2: Framework for life cycle assessment (based on ISO14040:2006) (click image to zoom)
This gives rise to the possibility that 1kg of a new material produces much higher environmental impacts than 1kg of a traditional material, but because the new material is so much more effective in its performance, the impacts to deliver a required level of performance actually turn out to be much less. The product being analysed, the hierarchy of inputs and the level of details of the life cycle all go to define the system boundary (not to be confused with a building services system). The definitions of the system boundary and of the functional unit are fundamental tasks in setting the goal and scope of a Life Cycle Assessment. From this the inventory is constructed and then analysed for the environmental impacts – see Figure 2. At each stage, the analysis is
interpreted and checked to make sure that the required levels of model accuracy, and levels of completion and precision of the inventory are all achieved.

BSRIA runs an Introduction to economic and environmental appraisal training course covering Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing.

Visa, Visa Debit, Mastercard, Maestro cards accepted BSI ISO 9001 Cyber Essentials Investors in People